Saturday, October 02, 2010

Do you notice something missing?


 
     I noticed something missing. Before I posted my comment, I noticed that there was a response by Bahnsen Burner. I thought I could refer to that response when making my own comment. But I was wrong! By the time I hit "Post a Comment," Dan had removed that comment. In all likelihood he planned to say that Blogger simply put it in spam. But if Blogger had put it there, I would not have noticed it. Blogger approved it as a published comment. And Dan disapproved it.

13 comments:

Dan +†+ said...

DUDE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Blogger put those in Spam. How can you claim anything else? You are assuming that if its seem briefly that it MUST MEAN that I am doing something. How are you certain that spammed comments ARE NOT posted briefly?

RIGHT WHEN YOU POSTED YOUR COMMENT
With the snide remark that I deleted the comments I went into the spam section and clicked not spam to those comments.

SO the question is, IF THEY WERE DELETED then why are they there now?

Are you claiming that I am merely messing with ONLY your own narcissistic ego so that you could tag me with these accusations????????

For what gain??????????

You are so completely illogical, its...sad.

Ditch the habit man!

I tell you what I will do the same and try to get my comments into spam while you are asleep right now.

It will be a massive blast with numbered posts. Hmm but you have word verification up. Maybe I will be too slow. We shall see.

Dan +†+ said...

Correction made start over again.

Go to my blog Debunking Atheists testing of rapid repeated comment. I will do this 20 times

Dan +†+ said...

I give up.

You win but you are wrong about me.

I will add word verification back and see if that works. I hate word verify though. I sure thought it was a waste of everyone's time but for you, I will try. It cannot be Spam if word verified right? Evidenced here. We shall see... stay tuned.

Word verify:blenew

As in Blew a good thing, time for something new.

Dan +†+ said...

Ah haaaaaaaaa!!!!!!!!!!!!

MY original comment was there then it disappeared. Hmm where did it GO!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Maybe Spammmmmm Bwaahahahahhahah

Dan +†+ said...

Apparently Word verify doesn't work either so I will probably revert back to my original format and tell you to...

Praise God.

Well at least you are now doing the EXACT thing I am doing and that is deleting comments. UNLESS you wish to retract EVERYTHING you said that placed me in a bad light. Wait until you see my post about it! It will be nothing less then brutal.

Just another atheistic worldview debunked yet again.

Dan +†+ said...

BTW my exhibits 'A' and 'C' would convict you for years if this were a crime. You would do prison time for those.

Please do the right thing.

Dan +†+ said...

Wanna see my new slide show about it?

Good entertainment! I am sure you will agree.

*ahem

Dan +†+ said...

Pvb,

>>But if Blogger had put it there, I would not have noticed it.

How Ironic, the The Arrogance of Atheism.

Please repent and come to California to buy me a lemon-aid.

Wait, I have two lemon trees so just show up and I will make you the best lemon-aid you ever had. :7)

Pvblivs said...

     Very well, Dan, I will concede that it is possible to get Blogger to "spam" an already published comment, if you post 30 comments over the course of 20 minutes. I have to go where the evidence leads.
     "Are you claiming that I am merely messing with ONLY your own narcissistic ego so that you could tag me with these accusations????????"
     Of course not. That was someone else's comment that went missing there. I am thinking more along the lines of hiding an inconvenient comment and reinserting it later when it is in the middle of the stream and no one will notice it except when checking a claim that the comment is absent. This would allow to control the flow of the argument. That would be your gain.
     "I tell you what I will do the same and try to get my comments into spam while you are asleep right now."
     Please note that I put no effort toward getting my comments into spam. I think I will remove your countdown and duplicate posts as they add nothing but clutter. I will keep your various accusations.

Dan +†+ said...

Pvb,

>>I am thinking more along the lines of hiding an inconvenient comment and reinserting it later when it is in the middle of the stream and no one will notice it except when checking a claim that the comment is absent. This would allow to control the flow of the argument. That would be your gain.

Great then, we now both agree that is exactly what you did to manipulate and control the flow of this argument. As evidenced by your manipulation of the comment! To say otherwise is a exercise of futility. Sucks doesn't it?

Man up dude. Either acknowledge that I played NO PART in your accusations, to manipulate or control the flow of the argument, or I will be forced to defend myself aggressively in my own blog as a new post. What say you?

Pvblivs said...

     "Great then, we now both agree that is exactly what you did to manipulate and control the flow of this argument."
     Doesn't that conflict with your assertion that I was asleep when you made those posts? I have already conceded that it possible to get Blogger to move a comment from published to spam. You had to post 30 comments within 20 minutes to accomplish this, though. The condition on your blog just doesn't seem to fit.

Pvblivs said...

Dan:

     I am reposting your comment minus an inappropriate derogatory name.

----------------------------

Pvb,

>>Doesn't that conflict with your assertion that I was asleep when you made those posts?

You're right, you were awake the whole time.

>>You had to post 30 comments within 20 minutes to accomplish this, though. The condition on your blog just doesn't seem to fit.

I am sure you are a aware that I get hundreds of people a day posting on my blog. That amount of traffic could easily satisfy the same scenario that I duplicated here.

And on that note...

I see now you are NOT willing to admit that I played no part in any conspiracy to foil people with comments manipulation.

I conclude that you are not a man at all. That the evidence can be right in front of your face and that still will not convince you from your overzealous paranoia. I still believe you are on drugs, because no real man would of taken it this far to slander someone. Either you have an agenda against me, or Christians, or you are just a frightened little boy.

I feel sorry for you.

Pvblivs said...

     "I am sure you are a aware that I get hundreds of people a day posting on my blog. That amount of traffic could easily satisfy the same scenario that I duplicated here."
     You get a couple dozen comments a day. Even if you did get -- say -- 300 in a twelve-hour period, that would average to 25 in an hour, less than one-third the rate you needed to do the replication. Your loss of comments is still suspiciously frequent.
     "I see now you are NOT willing to admit that I played no part in any conspiracy to foil people with comments manipulation."
     I conspiracy would require that others actively took part in the endeavor. I think you did this on your own. But, turning to my actual accusation and using an analogy, you have demonstrated that lightning strike occur but are rare. You are trying to say that lightning took out dozens of your houses, but no one else's. I find it too suspicious.
     "I conclude that you are not a man at all. That the evidence can be right in front of your face and that still will not convince you from your overzealous paranoia. I still believe you are on drugs, because no real man would of taken it this far to slander someone. Either you have an agenda against me, or [c]hristians, or you are just a frightened little boy."
     None of the above. I follow the evidence where it leads. As yet, the evidence supports the accusation against you. And, seriously, for it to be me having an agenda against you, I would need to be deleting the comments to your blog. And I just don't have that power. I couldn't do it if I wanted to. One of us may be on drugs; but it isn't I.