He's not even a good liar.

     Daniel is at it again, predicting the imminent destruction of California. You will excuse me if I don't make travel plans. However, that idiocy is not the point of my post. My point is that on this thread he makes the following comments: "Also Oranges, this proves that if you have a serious question, and are not simply chanting your nonsense, your posts will get thru." "I repent of letting your posts thru, since I trust you will only return to your liberal useful idiocy. You were not banned before, you were just boring.
Now you are banned."
     It seems obvious that Daniel had already banned Oranges (for being inconvenient to his lies) but made an exception to "prove" that he hadn't engaged in such nonsense. Seriously, if you take Daniel at his word, he changed his mind because Oranges made a post that he considered valid.
     Still, I wonder what lies he will come up with on the morning of the 29th when California is still standing. I really don't think he will have the courage to admit that he was only speaking for himself. After all, he already hides from truth, banning those bloggers who expose his lies. He seems to be a frail little shell of a human being. Of course, I don't know him personally. It could all be an illusion. But it is a running theme of his known actions on his blog.